We Show Our Work.
Results in credit repair depend on the file, the specialist, and the strategy. Here's what D2G delivers — and exactly how we measure it.
avg deletion rate on verified disputes
avg score improvement at 6 months
average bureau response time
CROA compliance rate across all letters
These numbers are earned, not estimated.
File Baseline
Every client starts with a full credit report parse. AMELIA establishes a baseline: number of negative items, types of violations, score range.
Dispute Tracking
Every dispute letter sent is tracked by round, bureau, account, and statute cited. We track what we sent and what came back.
Outcome Recording
Deletions, updates, and verifications are logged at the item level. We know exactly which arguments worked.
Score Monitoring
Score pulls at 30, 90, and 180 days measure actual trajectory. We correlate dispute outcomes to score movement.
Why the results follow the tools.
Unique Arguments
AMELIA never writes the same letter twice. Unique statutory arguments have a higher rate of investigation because bureaus can't categorize them as frivolous.
Round Escalation
Each round increases legal pressure. By round 3, AMELIA is citing FCRA §1681n (civil liability) and FDCPA §1692k (damages). Bureaus respond differently under legal threat.
CFPB Amplification
When bureaus stall past 30 days, AMELIA generates CFPB complaint text. Filed complaints trigger a separate investigation track with higher deletion rates.
Results vary by file, specialist, and dispute strategy. Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.